A fabulous aspect of being an academic is not only the fascinating people one meets professionally but also in that one is always learning, growing, and challenging oneself.
Some of that great professional and personal growth comes through hearing experts speak on their latest work!
This past week, I had the pleasure of welcoming back to the UMass Amherst campus, my 6th PhD student, Dr. Stavros Siokos, who is the Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Astarte Capital Partners, based in London, England. Dr. Siokos and I co-authored the Financial Networks book, which was published by Springer in 1997, as well as multiple journal articles.
Stavros has had a meteoric career in the financial industry and it was wonderful to have him speak in our UMass Amherst INFORMS Speaker Series. He has received major awards for his work, including the "CEO Today Europe Award 2018," "Game Changer of 2018" by the Finance Monthly, and "The Most Innovative Manager of 2017" by Fund Intelligence.
Dr. Siokos flew in from London to Boston and, Tuesday evening, on a very chilly day that broke records, we dined at Judie's in downtown Amherst. The food was delicious!
Stavros started his career at Salomon Brothers in London and later became Managing Director of Citigroup. I recall picking up a copy of the Wall Street Journal and seeing the announcement of his appointment as Managing Director! When I have a chance to be in London, I always try to make a point of seeing him. And, because he has offices in major cities around the globe, I have even "run into" him in the middle of Manhattan, during the holiday season, no less.
His talk at the Isenberg School on investing in private markets for social and environmental benefits was truly inspirational.
As a PhD alumnus of UMass Amherst, it was very special and meaningful for the PhD students and, even undergraduates in the audience, to see what one can accomplish through hard work, dedication, focus, and also charisma, I might add. A favorite slide from his presentation was the one below quoting Charles Darwin, which Stavros paraphrased as: "If you aren't able to adapt to change, you die!"
Stavros began his talk by emphasizing UN sustainability goals, and the making of investments that "help" everyone. He asked the question: "What is the biggest impact that we can have?"
He also noted mega macro trends in his fabulous presentation, including the ageing of the population, food security, and climate change.
He emphasized that "if you do something good, you will make more." He discussed, also accompanied with outstanding videos, some of his company's investments, from Project Cusco in Paraguay, where eucalyptus is being grown with areas between the growth reserved for farming; investments in India and East Africa, with the latter involving a female in Kenya, who is producing very successful soap products, as well as the amazing Olympia project that he is involved in, in London!
It was clear that his Operations Research PhD background illuminates a lot of his work. He stated that "let's do mining, but make it better;" "let's make container ships more efficient," and so on. It was clear from his presentation that, when it comes to supply chains and sustainability, that we need to include the full life cycle costs and impacts.
It was also very moving to hear about the investments into education, including that of children with disabilities.
Stavros has had the pleasure of meeting Nelson Mandela and former President Bill Clinton, among many other leaders, and has even been advising Warren Buffett. Buffett once asked Stavros his ideas on how to become successful, and, when Stavros told him that it is "Doing what you want, where you want to do it, and when," Buffet responded that that is the definition of success. But to achieve that, you have to hang in there until you become "lucky."
I always tell my students that one needs to take into consideration where an individual has started from to appropriately measure one's success.
After his fabulous presentation, I took a photo of some of the students with Dr. Siokos.
Haris Sipetas, the incredible UMass Amherst INFORMS Student Chapter webmaster, conducted an interview with Dr. Siokos in the Supernetworks Lab at the Isenberg School. The interview, once edited and approved, will be posted on the chapter's youtube channel, where you can access previous interviews with our speakers (and learn a lot)! And, for additional photos and highlights, please check out Haris' post on Dr. Siokos' talk. What serendipity and an incredible coincidence - both Sipetas and Siokos had received undergraduate degrees in engineering from the University of Patras in Greece!
Showing posts with label CSR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CSR. Show all posts
Sunday, November 17, 2019
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
Advice on Doing Research, Publishing, and Reviewing from Nordlog PhD Workshop in Sweden
Yesterday, I had the pleasure of taking part in the 2013 Nordlog Symposium at the School of Business, Economics and Law at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden.
The symosium is part of the 2013 NOFOMA Conference, which begins today, and will take place at the Chalmers University of Technology, also in Gothenburg. This is the 25th NOFOMA!
The main activities of the network include:
Joining me in the morning part of te workshop yesterday were: Professors Alex Ellinger of the School of Business at the University of Alabama and Professor Patrick Jonsson of Chalmers.
Professor Ellinger provided the participants, which included PhD students from Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Germany, insights into the journal submission process and reviewing. He provided the perspective of an Editor.
He had some fabulous stories (I am sure that you probably have your personal ones as well), which included the following.
1. In one referee's report on a paper, the reviewer wrote: You should read the literature of Professor SOANDSO. The paper was actually written by Professor SOANDSO (the review process was double blind so the author did not know the reviewer and the reviewer did not know the author).
2. In another true story, he recalled a report that he received that said that he needs to get a proofreader for his English. (Professor Ellinger was born in England and is a native speaker of English.)
I shared my experience of a report that I had received in which the (anonymous) reviewer wrote: Please add the initial "L." to my middle name in the references.
Professor Jonsson spoke of how he goes about reviewing a paper from his personal perspective and approach and I found it very similar to mine. He emphasized that one should quickly respond to a request for a review (whether positive or negative) and spoke on the cycle of reviewing, getting the paper back, reading and reviewing the revision (assuming not a rejection), and so on.
In addition, Jonsson said that once he received a paper to review, which he had authored, so he, gracefully, declined. The Editor then responded that he clearly picked a reviewer who knows the area.
I emphasized in my presentation, where one can gets ideas for research from, how to select a journal. the importance of being very professional and diplomatic in responding to reviewers and also in preparing the manuscript. I also emphasized that one should believe in one's work, never give up, since even Nobel prize winners (in different fields) have had their major papers rejected (some, such as Akerlof, multiple times).
I also spoke on the philosophy of research and why conducting research is so rewarding.
In the afternoon, we circulated among the doctoral students, all of whom have had their papers reviewed for the NOFOMA Conference, at which they will be presenting them. The goal is to ultimately (since this conference does not produce a copyright publication) have the work accepted in a journal. The limits of the papers were at about 16 pages and it was clear that the students had so many interesting ideas --sometimes difficult to fully develop within the page limit.
In my group there was papers on biosensors in food supply chains with a major funded project in Sweden, in which the doctoral student is even developing the biosensors. With so much food being wasted throughout the supply chain there could be huge environmental and economic gains from such a holistic and technological innovation. Given my latest book, Networks Against Time: Supply Chain Analytics for Perishable Products, I was very interested in this paper.
Another paper was by a doctoral student from Germany and it focused on package optimization in the supply chain. She had worked for the innovative company TetraPak and the discussions were very good as to how to make the paper even better. She had surveyed Swedish companies in food and in manufacturing to find out what they were doing in terms of packaging and the supply chain. She found that business to business firms were not as concerned about capturing the consumers' eye as were the business to consumer firms, which wanted to draw the attention of the consumer to their products and, hence, might have bigger packaging than might be warranted from an environmental standpoint. I was reminded of the work of Jack Ampuja of Nagara University who has a company that does packaging optimization and he has come to the Isenberg School of Mnagement at UMass Amherst on several occasions to speak to my students.
Several of the students in my group were from Lund University and there are 3 different departments of logistics there!
Another paper was on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and supply chains and I brought out that one of my former students, Jose M. Cruz, who is now an Associate Professor at UConn''s School of Business, had done a lot of work on this topic, and which had been published in EJOR, IJPE, and IJPR.
Given the largest disaster in the history of the garment industry that took place in Bangladesh, in which over 1,000 perished in a factory collapse, and now the fire in the poultry plant in China in which over 100 perished, CSR, integrated with supply chains, to include the crucial human element is essential.
I also very much enjoyed the paper by a more senior doctoral student on supply chain strategy (or design) associated with different products in which he brought out the significance of the paper in the Harvard Business Review of Marshall Fisher of Wharton, well-known to us on OR/MS.
There were also papers on humanitarian logistics but the day went by too quickly to be able to delve deeply into all. I look forward to hearing additional presentations at NOFOMA today and tomorrow.
Below are some photos taken at the workshop. The lunch of salmon and potatoes was delicious!
Many thanks to the organizers for this fascinating workshop that was very well-done.
And the speakers were even presented with a gift -- how thoughtful!
The symosium is part of the 2013 NOFOMA Conference, which begins today, and will take place at the Chalmers University of Technology, also in Gothenburg. This is the 25th NOFOMA!
About NOFOMA
NOFOMA is a network of Nordic researchers within the field of Logistics and Supply Chain Management. The aim of NOFOMA is to contribute to the continuous improvement and further development of Nordic logistics research and researchers.The main activities of the network include:
- The Annual NOFOMA Conference on logistics research.
- The Nordlog Doctoral Symposium focusing on issues of particular relevance to doctoral students. This event takes place in connection with the annual conference.
- The NOFOMA Educators Conference focusing on issues of particular interest to teaching and education. This event takes place in connection with the annual conference.
- The Joint-Nordic PhD Program in Logistics. See more about the program in Ojala and Hilmola (eds.): "Case Study Research in Logistics"; Publications of The Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Series B 1:2003.
Joining me in the morning part of te workshop yesterday were: Professors Alex Ellinger of the School of Business at the University of Alabama and Professor Patrick Jonsson of Chalmers.
Professor Ellinger provided the participants, which included PhD students from Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Germany, insights into the journal submission process and reviewing. He provided the perspective of an Editor.
He had some fabulous stories (I am sure that you probably have your personal ones as well), which included the following.
1. In one referee's report on a paper, the reviewer wrote: You should read the literature of Professor SOANDSO. The paper was actually written by Professor SOANDSO (the review process was double blind so the author did not know the reviewer and the reviewer did not know the author).
2. In another true story, he recalled a report that he received that said that he needs to get a proofreader for his English. (Professor Ellinger was born in England and is a native speaker of English.)
I shared my experience of a report that I had received in which the (anonymous) reviewer wrote: Please add the initial "L." to my middle name in the references.
Professor Jonsson spoke of how he goes about reviewing a paper from his personal perspective and approach and I found it very similar to mine. He emphasized that one should quickly respond to a request for a review (whether positive or negative) and spoke on the cycle of reviewing, getting the paper back, reading and reviewing the revision (assuming not a rejection), and so on.
In addition, Jonsson said that once he received a paper to review, which he had authored, so he, gracefully, declined. The Editor then responded that he clearly picked a reviewer who knows the area.
I emphasized in my presentation, where one can gets ideas for research from, how to select a journal. the importance of being very professional and diplomatic in responding to reviewers and also in preparing the manuscript. I also emphasized that one should believe in one's work, never give up, since even Nobel prize winners (in different fields) have had their major papers rejected (some, such as Akerlof, multiple times).
I also spoke on the philosophy of research and why conducting research is so rewarding.
In the afternoon, we circulated among the doctoral students, all of whom have had their papers reviewed for the NOFOMA Conference, at which they will be presenting them. The goal is to ultimately (since this conference does not produce a copyright publication) have the work accepted in a journal. The limits of the papers were at about 16 pages and it was clear that the students had so many interesting ideas --sometimes difficult to fully develop within the page limit.
In my group there was papers on biosensors in food supply chains with a major funded project in Sweden, in which the doctoral student is even developing the biosensors. With so much food being wasted throughout the supply chain there could be huge environmental and economic gains from such a holistic and technological innovation. Given my latest book, Networks Against Time: Supply Chain Analytics for Perishable Products, I was very interested in this paper.
Another paper was by a doctoral student from Germany and it focused on package optimization in the supply chain. She had worked for the innovative company TetraPak and the discussions were very good as to how to make the paper even better. She had surveyed Swedish companies in food and in manufacturing to find out what they were doing in terms of packaging and the supply chain. She found that business to business firms were not as concerned about capturing the consumers' eye as were the business to consumer firms, which wanted to draw the attention of the consumer to their products and, hence, might have bigger packaging than might be warranted from an environmental standpoint. I was reminded of the work of Jack Ampuja of Nagara University who has a company that does packaging optimization and he has come to the Isenberg School of Mnagement at UMass Amherst on several occasions to speak to my students.
Several of the students in my group were from Lund University and there are 3 different departments of logistics there!
Another paper was on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and supply chains and I brought out that one of my former students, Jose M. Cruz, who is now an Associate Professor at UConn''s School of Business, had done a lot of work on this topic, and which had been published in EJOR, IJPE, and IJPR.
Given the largest disaster in the history of the garment industry that took place in Bangladesh, in which over 1,000 perished in a factory collapse, and now the fire in the poultry plant in China in which over 100 perished, CSR, integrated with supply chains, to include the crucial human element is essential.
I also very much enjoyed the paper by a more senior doctoral student on supply chain strategy (or design) associated with different products in which he brought out the significance of the paper in the Harvard Business Review of Marshall Fisher of Wharton, well-known to us on OR/MS.
There were also papers on humanitarian logistics but the day went by too quickly to be able to delve deeply into all. I look forward to hearing additional presentations at NOFOMA today and tomorrow.
Below are some photos taken at the workshop. The lunch of salmon and potatoes was delicious!
Many thanks to the organizers for this fascinating workshop that was very well-done.
And the speakers were even presented with a gift -- how thoughtful!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







